Kagan’s life an undeviating course to high court
Kagan’s work has been her life. Groomed to achieve from her earliest years, Kagan’s made-to-order resume starts with Princeton, Oxford and Harvard. A clerkship under Marshall at the Supreme Court gives way to stints in private practice, teaching, the Clinton White House.
Kagan lived her life carefully and cleanly. Cleanly enough that in 1999 Clinton nominated her for a seat on the federal appeals court bench in Washington.
Then came a rare hiccup, not of Kagan’s own making: The Republican-controlled Senate never acted on her nomination. “Her” seat on the bench instead eventually went to future Chief Justice John Roberts.
Kagan did not let the setback slow her down. At Harvard, she quickly moved from visiting professor to full law professor to dean.
“Elena took the post at a time when I think most people thought that Harvard Law School was an unmanageable institution and did a remarkable job,” states Paul Clement, a former solicitor general for President George W. Bush and Kagan endorser. “It talks to the quality of her capability to deal with people from across ideological divides and to manage a very difficult institution.”
Kagan won praise for recruiting prominent conservatives to join the liberal lions on Harvard’s faculty.
But her tenure there also has given her critics a rallying point. As dean, Kagan defended the school’s restrictions on military recruitment on campus because of the Pentagon’s prohibition on openly gay service members. She called the policy “a moral injustice of the first order.” Kagan also stressed that her disagreement with the military did not extend beyond that single issue.
Kagan never did become a judge, which critics see as a problematic gap in her experience. Sen. Jeff Sessions of Alabama, the top Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee, sees in Kagan a “dangerous nominee” — young, with a thin legal record, a liberal bent and an affinity for activist judges.
But Justice Antonin Scalia, the high court’s most outspoken conservative, framed Kagan’s lack of judicial experience as an asset.
And Kagan got what might be the next-best thing: Obama chose her to be the first female solicitor general.
Over the past year, she is argued the government’s side in six cases before the Supreme Court, a daunting setting for a novice litigator. Kagan held her own and displayed a remarkably easy, informal style in her back-and-forth with the justices, unafraid to challenge their assumptions and even make a stab at humor.
Kagan, who’s 5-foot-3, began one case by rather dramatically turning a crank to lower the wooden lectern in the Supreme Court chambers, advising the justices, “This may take some time.”
For all her hard work and focus, Kagan is no machine. She is wry and funny and thoughtful. And, on occasion, snarky and profane, too.
In the solicitor general’s office, Kagan made it a point to send a personal note and a bottle of champagne — a nice one — each time an assistant argued his or her first case before the Supreme Court.
Bruce Reed, Kagan’s boss during her years on Clinton’s domestic policy council, which dealt with a host of thorny issues, states Kagan was always “quick to laugh about herself and about the situations we found ourselves in.”
“Most really smart people aren’t fun to work with, but she is,” Reed said.
Kagan’s e-mails from the Clinton years include some blisteringly frank language — some of it directed at herself.
“I f—ed up,” she wrote in one.
“Don’t volunteer us for s—work,” she wrote in another.
Kagan also has a temper, and is not afraid to show it.
Harvard law professor Charles Fried, a Republican who supports Kagan’s nomination, states she once blew up at him during a disagreement concerning what to do about pages missing from a constitutional law exam.
“She screamed and shouted at me and slammed the door and stormed out,” Fried recalled. “Two minutes later, she came back and said, ‘I’m sorry I shouted.’ I said, ‘Elena, do not apologize, you were right.’”
Kagan, who is single, hasn’t made much of a splash in Washington’s social scene. Early whispers raising questions about her personal life were quickly squelched by the White House. Her parents — a school instructor and activist lawyer in Manhattan — both are deceased. Her two brothers declined to state much about the family, even though one brother, Irving, does grant that the siblings “have been known to talk about pie preferences” at Thanksgiving dinner.
“But she is never asked us to help her with her thinking about the law,” he stated in an e-mail.
While Kagan is known for keeping her legal opinions to herself, documents from her days in the Clinton administration show she was not afraid to be a strong advocate for her positions in private.
She scrawled “yuck,” on a document about race. A memo on welfare policy got the same treatment three times over: “yuck, yuck, yuck.”
“Oh please — one-sided,” she wrote on tobacco memo.
Kagan also has been a harsh critic of her own words, when expedient.
When questions arose last year about a 1987 memo she wrote about government funding for religious organizations, she called it “the dumbest thing I ever heard.”
She’s also backpedaled from a 1995 article in which she wrote that senators should draw out Supreme Court nominees’ opinions on important legal questions.
Asked about that last year, Kagan granted that some questions “cannot be answered consistently with the responsible performance of the job the nominee hopes to undertake.”
So Kagan comes into her Senate hearings with a slim legal record and a history of playing it safe in her public comments. That could ease her path to confirmation. But it begs another question: With a lifetime appointment and the freedom to talk her mind, will she remember how to do it?
Teresa Wynn Roseborough, who clerked in 1987-88 for now-retiring Justice John Paul Stevens when Kagan was in her 20s and working for Marshall, states Kagan was part of a group of clerks that played basketball every week on the top floor of the Supreme Court building. One time, when Roseborough made a comment during the game about something unrelated to basketball, she said, Kagan “quickly admonished me to get my head back into the game, and that is kind of how I saw her as a clerk.”
As a justice on the court, Roseborough said, “If somebody loses focus, she will get them back in the game.”
Copyright 2010 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Related News:
- As immigration case goes before high court, what it means for 2012
- Americans Aren’t Learning to Like ObamaCare
- Carbon tax unconstitutional: legal expert
- Three Roads From the Supreme Court
- B.C. anesthesiologists barred from taking job action
- Supreme Court expresses skepticism over constitutionality of health care mandate
- Court signals it will decide constitutionality of health care mandate
- $27B tobacco lawsuit headed for Quebec court
- Supreme Court to hear HIV disclosure case
- Unsafe asbestos handling leads to 60-day jail term
Details :
Submited at Sunday, June 27th, 2010 at 7:00 pm on Politics by samantha
Comment RSS 2.0 - leave a comment - trackback