One in five medical journal articles include honorary and ghost authors, study finds
ScienceDaily (Oct. 25, 2011) Just over one in five (21%) of articles published in six leading medical journals in 2008 have evidence of honorary and ghost authorship, finds a study published on-line in the British Medical Journal.
These results demonstrate that inappropriate authorship remains a problem in high impact biomedical publications, state the authors.
Inappropriate (honorary and ghost) authorship and the resulting lack of transparency and accountability have been important concerns for the academic community for decades. Honorary authors are individuals who are named as authors but have not contributed substantially to be able to take responsibility for the work. Ghost authors are individuals who have made substantial contributions to the work but are not named as authors.
In the 1980s, the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) developed guidelines for responsible and accountable authorship. These criteria are updated regularly and have been adopted by more than 600 biomedical journals. However, studies have found the prevalence of honorary authors to be as high as 39%, and ghost authors as high as 11% across a range of journals.
So a team of US researchers compared the prevalence of articles with honorary and ghost authors published in six leading general medical journals in 2008 with that reported by authors of articles published in 1996.
A total of 630 authors responded to the survey. The overall prevalence of articles with honorary authorship, ghost authorship, or both was 21%, a decline from 29% in 1996.
They found no change in the prevalence of honorary authors relative to 1996, but found a significant decline in the prevalence of ghost authorship.
The highest prevalence of both types of inappropriate authorship occurred in original research articles, as opposed to editorials and review articles.
These results demonstrate that inappropriate authorship remains a problem in high-impact biomedical publications, state the authors.
They conclude that “increased efforts by scientific journals, individual authors, and academic institutions are essential to promote responsibility, accountability, and transparency in authorship, and to maintain integrity in scientific publication.”
These results suggest that standards need tightening up, state Patricia Baskin and Robert Gross from the journal Neurology, in an accompanying editorial.
They point out that “as research becomes more collaborative and complex, the challenges to transparency in authorship and disclosure become greater,” and they call for further work “to assess whether greater definition of roles and conflicts of interest substantially change the prevalence of inappropriate authorship.”
Recommend this story on Facebook, Twitter,
Other bookmarking and sharing tools:
The above story is reprinted from materials provided by BMJ-British Medical Journal.
Note: Materials may be edited for content and length. For further information, please contact the source cited above.
J. S. Wislar, A. Flanagin, P. B. Fontanarosa, C. D. DeAngelis. Honorary and ghost authorship in high impact biomedical journals: a cross sectional survey. BMJ, 2011; 343 (oct25 1): d6128 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.d6128P. K. Baskin, R. A. Gross. Honorary and ghost authorship. BMJ, 2011; 343 (oct25 1): d6223 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.d6223
Note: If no author is given, the source is cited instead.
Disclaimer: This article is not intended to provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of ScienceDaily or its staff.
source : www.sciencedaily.com
Related News:
- New look at prolonged radiation exposure: At low dose-rate, radiation poses tiny risk to DNA, study suggests
- Toronto study links breakfast with school success
- Losing weight when obese can prevent or cure diabetes, whatever the initial BMI, study suggests
- Study links genes to common forms of glaucoma
- For Paul’s Believers, a Study in American Optimism
- Anxiety increases cancer severity in mice, study shows
- Study points to potential treatment for stroke
- Memory loss with aging not necessarily permanent, animal study suggests
- Prolonged fructose intake not linked to rise in blood pressure, study suggests
- Inherited risk factors for childhood leukemia are more common in Hispanic patients, study finds
Details :
Submited at Wednesday, October 26th, 2011 at 7:00 am on Health by Alina
Comment RSS 2.0 - leave a comment - trackback